Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Dynamite Marketing, Inc. v. The WowLine, Inc., No. 24-1523 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2025)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1523
Also Docketed
No. 24-1525 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 12, 2025
Judge
Clevenger, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Sherman Specialty, Inc., d/b/a The WowLine, Inc., and Sherman Specialty, LLC (collectively “Sherman”) app eal the final decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (“District Court”), de nying Sherman’s post-verdict motions for inventorship, in valid- ity, and non-infringement of Dynamite Marketing, In c.’s (“Dynamite”) U.S. Patent No. D751,877 S (“D877 Patent”), denying remittitur or a new trial on the jury’s award of lost profit damages to Dynamite, and awarding Dynamite a t- torney’s fees.