Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., No. 24-1467 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2026)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1467
Decided
January 16, 2026
Judge
Moore, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ ERIK R. PUKNYS, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff- appellant. Also represented by J AMES R. BARNEY, SMITH BRITTINGHAM, IV. DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH, ar- gued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by GRANT EDWARD KINSEL, THERESA H. NGUYEN, Seattle, WA. ______________________ GAMEVICE, INC. v. NINTENDO CO., LTD. 2 Before MOORE, Chief Judge, CHEN, Circuit Judge, and ANDREWS, District Judge.1 CHEN, Circuit Judge Gamevice, Inc.