Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Company, No. 24-1253 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1253
Decided
October 21, 2025
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC (“Rothschild”) sued Coca-Cola Co. (“Coca-Cola”) for infring- ing U.S. Patent No. 8,417,377 (“the ’377 patent”). The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granted summary judgment of noninfringement. Rothschild ap - peals. We affirm. I Rothschild challenges the district court’s interpre ta- tion of claim 11 of the ’377 patent as requiring that certain steps be performed in a particular order.