Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. v. iFit, Inc., No. 24-1177 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2025)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1177
Decided
August 11, 2025
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. appeals the district court’s decision to partially dismiss its complaint after concluding that almost all claims of the asserted patent are ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Because we conclude that the rele- vant claims of the asserted patent are not directed to an abstract idea, we reverse and remand for further proceed- ings. BACKGROUND PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. (“PowerBlock”) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, alleging that iFit, Inc. (“iFit”) infringed PowerBlock’s U.S. Patent No.