directPacket Research, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc., No. 24-1147 (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2025)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
______________________ TERENCE P. ROSS, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff -appellant. Also rep- resented by C HRISTOPHER FERENC, ALLY JORDAN, ERIC THOMAS WERLINGER, SEAN WOODEN. EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre- sented by D AVID DALKE, Los Angeles, CA; K ELLY CATHERINE HUNSAKER, MATTHEW R. MCCULLOUGH, Red- wood City, CA; SAMANTHA MAXFIELD LERNER, Chicago, IL. DIRECTPACKET RESEARCH, INC. v. POLYCOM, INC.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error