Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

directPacket Research, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc., No. 24-1147 (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 24-1147
Decided
June 25, 2025
Judge
Moore, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ TERENCE P. ROSS, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff -appellant. Also rep- resented by C HRISTOPHER FERENC, ALLY JORDAN, ERIC THOMAS WERLINGER, SEAN WOODEN. EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre- sented by D AVID DALKE, Los Angeles, CA; K ELLY CATHERINE HUNSAKER, MATTHEW R. MCCULLOUGH, Red- wood City, CA; SAMANTHA MAXFIELD LERNER, Chicago, IL. DIRECTPACKET RESEARCH, INC. v. POLYCOM, INC.