Duke University v. Sandoz Inc., No. 24-1078 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 18, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Please make the following changes: On page 8 lines 11-12, change “4,230, which was Allergan’s expert’s view, or 1,620, as Sandoz’s expert opined” to “4,230, which was Sandoz’s expert’s view, or 1,620, as Al- lergan’s expert opined” On page 16 footnote 4, change both instances of “—C=C—” to “—C≡C—”