Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., No. 24-1072 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 2, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Rex Medical, L.P. (“Rex”) sued Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., and Intuitive Surgical Holdings, LLC (collectively, “Intuitive”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware for patent infringement. Days before a jury trial began, the district court precluded Rex’s damages expert from testifying about a specific li- cense agreement for failure to apportion . At trial, neither party’s damages expert testified. The jury found that In- tuitive infringed claim 6 of U.S. Patent No.