Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Company, LLC, No. 23-2426 (Fed. Cir. July 23, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2426
Decided
July 23, 2025
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

SME Steel Contractors, Inc. and its sister company Core-Brace, LLC (collectively, “SME Steel”) brought claims of patent infringement, false advertising and false associa- tion under the Lanham Act, unfair competition and certain deceptive trade practices under Utah state law, and copy- right infringement against Seismic Bracing Co., LLC and Andrew Hinchman (collectively , “Seismic Bracing”). T he United States District Court for the District of Utah granted summary judgment to Seismic Bracing. For the following reasons, we affirm.