Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Fintiv, Inc. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc., No. 23-2312 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-2312
Decided
April 30, 2025
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Fintiv, Inc. (“Fintiv”) sued PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“Pay- Pal”) for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Relevant here, Fintiv as- serted U.S. Patent Nos. 9,892,386 (“the ’386 patent”), 11,120,413 (“the ’413 patent”), 9,208,488 (“the ’488 pa- tent”), and 10,438,196 (“the ’196 patent”) (collectively, “the asserted patents”). After claim construction, the district court determined certain claim terms in the asserted pa- tents were subject to 35 U.S.C.