Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

CAO Lighting, Inc. v. Feit Electric Company, Inc., No. 23-1906 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2024)

Vacated & Remanded
Claim Construction Non-Infringement Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1906
Decided
October 16, 2024
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ RONALD E. CAHILL, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff -appellant. Also represented by HEATHER B. REPICKY; TODD VARE, Indianapolis, IN. RYAN DYKAL, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant -appellee. Also represented by MARK SCHAFER; MAXWELL C. MCGRAW, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO; AMELIA ELIZABETH MURRAY, Chicago, IL. ______________________ CAO LIGHTING, INC. v. FEIT ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error