Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Coda Development s.r.o. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 23-1880 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2025)

Affirmed Judgment as a matter of law for Goodyear affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1880
Decided
December 8, 2025
Judge
Cunningham, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
17 pages

Editorial Summary

AI-assisted editorial summary; not attorney-reviewed. Verify against the opinion itself before relying on any characterization of the holding.

Coda Development, Coda Innovations, and inventor Frantisek Hrabal appealed from the Northern District of Ohio's decision (Lioi, J.) holding that Goodyear and its engineer Robert Benedict were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Coda's claims arising out of the parties' self-inflating tire discussions, including trade secret misappropriation and correction of inventorship of Goodyear's U.S. Patent No. 8,042,586. The Federal Circuit considered Coda's arguments, found them unpersuasive, and affirmed the district court's judgment for Goodyear.