Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Deere & Company v. Agco Corp., No. 23-1811 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1811
Decided
January 24, 2025
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Deere & Co. (“Deere”) sued AGCO Corp. and Precision Planting, LLC (collectively, “AGCO”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,813,663 (“the ’663 patent”) and 9,699,955 (“the ’955 patent”). At trial, the jury found that AGCO did not infringe Deere’s patents. The district court denied Deere’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on infringement and a new trial on in- fringement. Deere & Co. v. AGCO Corp., 659 F. Supp. 3d 418 (D. Del. 2023) (“Post-Trial Opinion”). Deere appeals, and we affirm.