Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Lowe v. Shieldmark, Inc., No. 23-1786 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 24, 2025)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1786
Also Docketed
No. 23-1871, No. 23-1893 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
March 24, 2025
Judge
Bryson, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This patent case is before us following remand proceed- ings in the district court. The parties have raised numer- ous issues on appeal. We affirm the district court’s decision on the issues of patent invalidity and false advertising un- der the Lanham Act, and on most of the procedural issues raised by the parties. We vacate and remand on one of the issues bearing on the sanctions imposed against the plain- tiffs. I Clifford A. Lowe is the inventor on U.S. Patent No.