Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., No. 23-1772 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 28, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This 18-year-old patent infringement action comes before this court for the f ifth time. The patentee, plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. (“Halo”) , appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for enhanced damages and attorney fees, and from the district court’s denial of a new trial on damages. The defendants, Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronic s Corporation (collectively, “Pulse”) cross-appeal from the district court’s award of prejudgment interest.