PS Products Inc. v. Panther Trading Co. Inc., No. 23-1665 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

PS PRODUCTS INC. v. PANTHER TRADING CO. INC. 2 PS Products, Inc. and Mr. Billy Pennington (collectively, PSP) appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas granting Panther Trading Company, Inc.’s (Panther) motion for sanctions. Because the district court did not apply an incorrect legal standard or abuse its discretion when awarding sanctions under its inherent power , w e affirm. Panther requests attorney fees and costs for this appeal, arguing PSP’s appeal is frivolous as argued.