Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A., No. 23-1639 (Fed. Cir. June 12, 2025)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1639
Also Docketed
No. 23-1866, No. 25-1276 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 12, 2025
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

PNC Bank, N.A. appeals the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas’s grant of United Services Auto- mobile Association’s motion for summary judgment of pa- tent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This appeal concerns U.S. Patent No. 10,769,598, U.S. Patent No. 10,402,638, and U.S. Patent No. 9,224,136. We limit our discussion to the ’638 patent because we have separately affirmed an in- ter partes review of the ’ 598 patent finding the asserted claims unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103, see United Ser- vices Automobile Ass ’n. v.