Osseo Imaging, LLC v. Planmeca USA Inc., No. 23-1627 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 4, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This case presents a question about the qualifications necessary to provide expert testimony from the perspective of one of ordinary skill in the art. Planmeca USA Inc. (“Planmeca”) appeals the District of Delaware’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) upholding the jury’s verdict that: (1) Planmeca infringes Osseo Imaging, LLC ’s (“ Os- seo”) U.S. Patent Nos. 6,381,301, 6,944,262, and 8,498,374; and (2) certain claims of the ’301 patent, ’262 patent, and ’374 patent are not invalid for obviousness .