Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Altria Client Services LLC v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, No. 23-1546 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1546
Decided
December 19, 2024
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Altria Client Services LLC (“Altria”) sued R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (“Reynolds”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,299,517 (“the ’517 patent”), 10,485,269 (“the ’269 patent”), and 10,492,541 (“the ’541 patent”). At trial, the jury found that Reynolds infringed Altria’s patents and awarded Altria over $95 million in damages. The jury also rejected Reynolds’s invalidity defense.