Bhagat v. PTO, No. 23-1545 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2024)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Urvashi Bhagat (“Bhagat”) appeals several orders from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia: requiring Bhagat to file paper motions to the court, rejecting her requests for discovery enlargement and rescheduling of the pretrial conference, denying her re- quest to file a second amended complaint, denying her re- quest to exclude an expert, granting defendant United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) partial mo- tion to dismiss Bhagat’s causes of action unrelated to pa- tent…
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error