Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ingenico Inc. v. Ioengine, LLC, No. 23-1367 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2025)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1367
Decided
May 7, 2025
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This is an appeal from the judgment issued by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to a jury verdict and the subsequent denial of mo- tion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial. Judgment, Ingenico, Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC, No. 18- 826-WCB (D. Del . July 25, 2022), ECF No. 506. IOENGINE appeals a jury verdict that found claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 9,059,969 and claims 56, 90, 101, 105, and 124 of U.S. Patent No. 9,774,703 invalid as anticipated and rendered obvious by the prior art .