Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings Inc., No. 23-1335 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2025)

Reversed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1335
Also Docketed
No. 23-1346 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 17, 2025
Judge
Reyna, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC appeals a district court judgment of noninfringement of its U.S. Paten t No. 7,128,988. Lambeth argues that the district co urt er- roneously construed the claim term “uniaxial symmet ry broken structure.” Seagate Technology (US) Holdings Inc. and Seagate Technology, LLC cross-appeal, arguing t hat the district court erred in denying judgment as a matter of law on invalidity, because a reasonable jury could not have found the patent enabled under 35 U.S.C. § 112.