Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Caselas, LLC v. VeriFone, Inc., No. 23-1036 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2024)

Affirmed
§ 101 Eligibility Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 23-1036
Also Docketed
No. 23-1038, No. 23-1040, No. 23-1041 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 28, 2024
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ MICHAEL SCOTT FULLER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Ty- ler, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by RANDALL T. GARTEISER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA. CAROLYN CHANG, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, for VeriFone, Inc. and argued for CASELAS, LLC v. VERIFONE, INC. 2 all defendants-appellees. MARCUS R. CHATTERTON, Balch & Bingham LLP, Bir- mingham, AL, for defendant -appellee Defyne Holdings, LLC. Also represented by JAMES T. DAWKINS, IV. ROBERT L.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error