Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Rady v. Boston Consulting Group, Inc., No. 22-2218 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2218
Decided
March 27, 2024
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Max A. Rady appeals an order of the United States Dis- trict Court for the Southern District of New York dismiss- ing his patent infringement claim after concluding that his asserted patent claimed ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND Rady owns U.S. Patent No. 10,469,250 (the “’250 pa- tent”), which is directed to “a framework [for] record[ing] to a blockchain” the “unique identification[s] (signatures) of physical items which hav e unique, random properties.” ’250 patent, Abstract.