Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Mobile Acuity Ltd. v. Blippar Ltd., No. 22-2216 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 6, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2216
Decided
August 6, 2024
Judge
Stark, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Mobile Acuity Ltd. (“Mobile Acuity”) appeals from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California (“Central District”) dis- missing its patent infringement action for failure to state a claim on the basis that the asserted patents claim ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. We affirm. I Mobile Acuity owns U.S. Patent Nos. 10,445,618 (“’618 patent”) and 10,776,658 (“’658 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).