Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ams-Osram USA Inc. v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc., No. 22-2185 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 4, 2025)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2185
Also Docketed
No. 22-2186 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
April 4, 2025
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In 2008, plaintiff ams-OSRAM USA Inc. ( formerly named Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. and hereafter called “TAOS”) sued Renesas Electronics Amer- ica, Inc. (formerly named Intersil Corporation and hereaf- ter called “Intersil”) in a federal district court in Texas . TAOS asserted patent infringement, but that claim is no longer at issue. TAOS also asserted state-law claims, of which two remain in the case : misappropriation of trade secrets, and breach of a confidentiality agreement.