Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Sherwin-Williams Company v. PPG Industries, Inc., No. 22-2059 (Fed. Cir. July 25, 2024)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-2059
Also Docketed
No. 22-2102 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 25, 2024
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Sherwin-Williams Company (“Sherwin” or “Sher- win-Williams”), the owner of U.S. Patent No. 8,617,663 (“’663 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 8,835,012 (“’012 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 9,242,763 (“’763 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 9,415,900 (“’900 patent ”), and U.S. Patent No. 9,862,854 (“’854 patent”), appeals from a judgment of patent invalid- ity from the District Court for the Western District of Penn- sylvania.