Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp., No. 22-1873 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2023)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This patent infringement case raises issues of obvious- ness, infringement, and damages. Cyntec Company, L td. sued Chilisin Electronics Corp. , alleging infri ngement of certain claims of Cyntec’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,922,312 (the ’312 patent) and 9,481,037 (the ’037 patent). Before closing arguments, the district court granted judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that the asserted claims were not invalid as obvious. The jury then found that Chilisin infringed the asserted claims and awarded the full amount of damages requested by Cyntec.