Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

NexStep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, No. 22-1815 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 24, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1815
Also Docketed
No. 22-2005, No. 22-2113 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
October 24, 2024
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
51 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

NexStep, Inc., (NexStep) appeals from a final judgment that Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, (Comcast) did not infringe U.S. Patent No s. 8,885,802 (’802 patent) and 8,280,009 (’009 patent). After construing the term “VoIP” in the ’802 patent, the district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement. The ’009 patent proceeded to a jury trial , and the jury found no literal infringement but infringement under the doctrine of equivalents .