Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

XR Communications, LLC v. D-Link Systems, Inc., No. 22-1785 (Fed. Cir. May 18, 2023)

Affirmed
Indefiniteness Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1785
Also Docketed
No. 22-1787, No. 22-1789, No. 22-1790, No. 22-1791, No. 22-1792 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 18, 2023
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

XR Communications, LLC dba Vivato Technologies (“Vivato”) appeals a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (“C.D. Cal. District Court”) holding claims 1 –9 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,611,231 invalid as indefinite. The C.D. Cal. District Court based its judgment on the collateral -estoppel effect of a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (“N.D. Cal. District Court”)—the lat- ter of which is the subject of companion appeal s Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error