Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., No. 22-1654 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 9, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Contour sued GoPro f or patent infringement. Accord- ing to Contour, several of GoPro’s point-of-view digital video camera products infringed its patents . After five years of litigation , GoPro sought summary judgment on grounds that Contour’s asserted claims were patent ineli- gible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The district court agreed with GoPro and entered judgment against Contour. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND I Contour IP Holding LLC (“Contour”) owns U.S. Patent Nos.