Califorrniaa v. Vidal, No. 22-1640 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2022)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Eurica Califorr niaa appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vir- ginia granting summary judgment in favor of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). See Califorr- niaa v. Hirshfeld , No. 1 -20-cv-00985, 2021 WL 6196996 (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2021). We affirm. BACKGROUND Califorrniaa alleges that the PTO incorrectly calcu- lated the Patent Term Adjustment ( “PTA”) for his patent, U.S. Patent 10,245,075 (the “ ’075 patent”), by improperly deducting 51 days due to applicant delay.