Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC v. Cengage Learning, Inc., No. 22-1468 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 17, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1468
Decided
January 17, 2023
Judge
Chen, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC (Riggs) appeals from a decision by the United States District Court for the Dis- trict of Massachusetts holding that the claims of U.S. P a- tent No. 7,299,067 (’067 patent) are directed to patent - ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. We affirm. BACKGROUND I The ’067 patent is titled “Methods and Systems for Managing the Provision of Training Provided Remotely Through Electronic Data Networks to Users of Remote Electronic Devices.” Claim 1 is representative 1 and recites: 1.