Trustid, Inc. v. Next Caller, Inc., No. 22-1433 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2023)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

TRUSTID, Inc. (“TRUSTID”) appeals from a decision of the United States District C ourt for the District of Dela- ware denying TRUSTID’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on a claim of infringement of U.S. Patents 8,238,532 (the “’532 patent”) and 9,001,985 (the “’985 pa- tent”) and granting Next Caller, Inc.’s (“Next Caller’s”) mo- tion for JMOL on a claim of false advertising under the Lanham Act. See TRUSTID, Inc. v. Next Caller, Inc. , No. 1:18-cv-00172, 2022 WL 318299 (D. Del. Jan. 5, 2022) (“De- cision”).