Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Hantz Software, LLC v. Sage Intacct, Inc., No. 22-1390 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 20, 2023)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1390
Decided
March 20, 2023
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Hantz Software, LLC (“Hantz”) sued Sage Intacct, Inc. (“Sage”) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Sage infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 8,055,559 and 8,055,560 (the “asserted patents”). Hantz’s first amended complaint (the operative complaint) alleged that Sage infringed claims 1 and 31–33 of each as- serted patent. Sage moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing that the complaint asserted patent-ineligible claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101.