Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Agarwal v. Morbark, LLC, No. 22-1348 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1348
Decided
June 10, 2022
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

AGARWAL v. MORBARK, LLC 2 Amit Agarwal, appearing pro se, appeals from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. That judgment rested on Mr. Agarwal’s con- ceded inability to prove his patent-infringement claims un- der the district court’s construction of the term “passive sensor.” We affirm. I Before the district court, Mr. Agarwal alleged that Morbark, LLC infringed claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,418,004 (“the ’004 patent”). Claim 1, the ’004 patent’s only independent claim, recites in relevant part: 1.