Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. GoVision, LLC, No. 22-1098 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 23, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1098
Decided
February 23, 2023
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC (“Ultravision”) sued Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., L td. and Absen Inc. (collectively, “Absen” or “Appellees” ) for patent infringe- ment. After claim construction, Ultravision stipulated to noninfringement of claims 14 and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,047,791 (“the ’791 patent”) and claims 15 and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 9,666,105 (“the ’105 patent”).1 A jury later returned a verdict of noninfringement and invalidity of claim 9 of U.S. Patent No. 9,916,782 (“the ’782 patent”) .