Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., No. 22-1027 (Fed. Cir. July 18, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1027
Also Docketed
No. 22-1028 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 18, 2022
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CareDx, Inc. and The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (“Stanford”) (collectively, “CareDx”) appeal from a decision of the United States Dis- trict Court for the District of Delaware holding that U.S. Patents 8,703,652 (the “’652 patent”), 9,845,497 (the “’497 patent”), and 10,329,607 (the “’607 patent”) are ineligible for patent under 35 U.S.C. § 101. See CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc. , 563 F. Supp. 3d 329 (D. Del. 2021) (“ Deci- sion”). We affirm. CAREDX, INC. v. NATERA, INC.