Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 21-2320 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2320
Also Docketed
No. 21-2376 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
April 5, 2023
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Joe Salazar appeals the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas’s judgment of noninfringe- ment, challenging the court’s claim construction. Mr. Sal- azar contends that the court erroneously construed “a microprocessor” to mean one microprocessor, contrary to this court’s precedent. AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint United Management Company , T -Mobile USA, I nc., and C ellco Partnership Inc., dba Verizon Wireless, Inc. (collectively, “AT&T”) cross-appeal the district court’s ruling that Mr.