Lowe v. Shieldmark, Inc., No. 21-2164 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2022)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Clifford A. Lowe and InSite Solutions, LLC ( “Lowe”) appeal from the decisions of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (1) granting s um- mary judgment following claim construction that Shield- Mark, Inc. et al. (“ShieldMark”) does not infringe claims 1– 6, 10–16, and 20 –21 of U.S. Patent 10,214,664 (“the ’664 patent”), (2) dismissing Lowe’s claim for a declaratory judg- ment of invalidity and unenforceability of U.S. Patent 10,738,220 (“the ’220 patent”), and (3) denying attorney fees. Lowe v. ShieldMark, Inc., No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error