Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC v. Ford Motor Company, No. 21-1949 (Fed. Cir. July 18, 2022)

Vacated & Remanded
Claim Construction Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1949
Decided
July 18, 2022
Judge
Moore, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ STEVEN M. SEIGEL, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiffs -appellants. Also represented by MATTHEW ROBERT BERRY, ANDRES HEALY. MICHAEL S. CONNOR, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for defendant -appellee. Also represented by KIRK T. BRADLEY; NATALIE CHRISTINE CLAYTON, ANDREW JAMES LIGOTTI, New York, NY. ______________________ ETHANOL BOOSTING SYSTEMS, LLC v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY 2 Before MOORE, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error