Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc., No. 21-1834 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1834
Decided
June 3, 2022
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Kingston Technology Company, Inc. (“Kingston”) ap- peals the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Cal- ifornia’s judgment that Kingston willfully infringed claims 1, 4, and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,926,544 (“the ’544 patent”) and awarding $7,515,327.40 in compensatory damages, en- hanced by 50 percent. We affirm. BACKGROUND I The ’544 patent is generally directed to “[a] flash memory apparatus having a single body type rotary cover.” ’544 patent Abstract.