Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Astrazeneca AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 21-1729 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2021)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1729
Decided
December 8, 2021
Judge
Stoll, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
38 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

AstraZeneca AB and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (collectively, “AstraZeneca”) sued Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Kindeva Drug Delivery L.P. (collectively, “Mylan”) for infringement of all claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,759,328; 8,143,239; and 8,575,137 (collectively, the “asserted pa- tents”). After claim construction, Mylan stipulated to in- fringement and the district court entered judgment accordingly.