Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Plasmacam, Inc. v. Cncelectronics, LLC, No. 21-1689 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 3, 2022)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1689
Decided
February 3, 2022
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

PlasmaCAM, Inc. (“Plasmacam”) sued CNCElectron- ics, LLC, Fourhills Designs, LLC, and Thomas and Martha Caudle (collectively “CNC”) in the Eastern District of Texas for infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,071,441 (“the ’441 patent”) for which Plasmacam has an exclusive license . In Decem- ber 2019, the parties notified the district court that they had settled the case . However, when the parties met to draft a formal agreement, it became evident that they in- terpreted the settlement differently, and further negotia- tions resulted.