The California Institute v. Broadcom Limited, No. 20-2222 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 4, 2022)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Please make the following changes: Page 23, lines 28-29 (majority opinion): “all claims and grounds not in the IPR but which reasonably could have been included” is changed to “all grounds not stated in the petition but which reasonably could have been asserted against the claims included.” Page 24, line 1 (majority opinion): “ grounds asserted” is changed to “challenged claims.”