Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Pacific Biosciences v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, No. 20-2155 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2155
Also Docketed
No. 20-2156 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 11, 2021
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PacBio) sued Ox- ford Nanopore Technologies, Inc. and Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Ltd. (collectively, Oxford), accusing Oxford of infringing several of its patents, including U.S. Patent Nos. 9,546,400 and 9,772,323. A jury found all asserted claims infringed but also determined that they are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 for lack of enablement. The district court denied PacBio’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (and for a new trial) on enablement.