Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

CardioNet, LLC v. InfoBionic, Inc., No. 20-2123 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 29, 2021)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2123
Also Docketed
No. 20-2150 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
October 29, 2021
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CardioNet, LLC and Braemar Manufacturing, LLC (collectively, “CardioNet”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Massachu- setts granting summary judgment that InfoBionic did not infringe claims 1 –2, 8, 11 –12, and 20 –21 of U.S. Patent 7,099,715 (“the ’715 patent”). CardioNet, LLC v. InfoBi- onic, Inc. , No. 1:15 -CV-11803-IT, 2020 WL 4559934 (D. Mass. June 22, 2020) (“Summary Judgment Decision”).