Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Bright Data Ltd. v. BI Science (2009) Ltd., No. 20-2118 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30, 2023)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2118
Also Docketed
No. 20-2181, No. 21-1664, No. 21-1667 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 30, 2023
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Bright Data Lt d. (“Bright Data”) 1 sued BI Science (2009) Ltd. and BI Science Inc. (individually or collectively, “BI Science”)2 for patent infringement in the Eastern Dis- trict of Texas. The district court entered final judgment that: (1) incorporated all terms of the parties’ mediated set- tlement agreement; (2) incorporated all terms of the arbi- tration award (the product of an arbitration that followed the district court’s enforcement of the settlement); and (3) held claim 108 of U.S. Paten t No.