Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

vPersonalize Inc. v. Magnetize Consultants Ltd., No. 20-1963 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 4, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1963
Decided
February 4, 2021
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Magnetize Consultants Ltd. (“Magnetize”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington denying Magnetize’s motion for at- torneys’ fees and costs. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND vPersonalize Inc. (“vPersonalize”) owns three patents, U.S. Patent Nos.