Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Omega Patents, LLC v. CalAmp Corp., No. 20-1793 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 14, 2021)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1793
Also Docketed
No. 20-1794 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 14, 2021
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
41 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

CalAmp Corp. (“CalAmp”) appeals from a judgment of infringement and award of damages as to U.S. Patent No. 8,032,278 (“the ’278 patent”). Omega Patents, LLC (“Omega”) cross-appeals the district court’s determination of the post-verdict royalty rate. We affirm the judgment of infringement of the asserted claims of the ’278 patent but vacate and remand for a new trial on damages. Omega’s cross-appeal is therefore moot. The jury further found that CalAmp did not induce in- fringement of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No.