Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Super-Sparkly Safety Stuff v. Skyline USA, Inc., No. 20-1490 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1490
Decided
December 11, 2020
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Super -Sparkly Safety Stuff, LLC (“Super - Sparkly”) appeals a decision of the U nited States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Defendant Skyline USA, Inc. (“Skyline”), concluding that Skyline had not in- fringed Super-Sparkly’s design patent. We affirm. BACKGROUND Super-Sparkly owns a design patent for bedazzled pep- per spray canisters , U.S. Patent No. D731,172 ( “the ’172 patent”).